Tuesday 17 October 2023

A Double Life (1947)


 ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆

A Double Life (1947) – G. Cukor

I’ve had this DVD for a couple of decades and it is a comfortably familiar watch, reminding me of my time in the theatre (high school and some of college). Ronald Colman (who won the Best Actor Oscar for this part) plays Tony John, a Broadway leading man, currently starring in a smash hit comedy but being enticed to consider Othello as his next big role. Screenwriters Ruth Gordon and Garson Kanin use their knowledge of the theatre to good effect to bring authentic backstage drama to the screen. Director George Cukor allows Colman the latitude to develop his character, an actor who allows his parts to intrude too much into his personal and daily life (cue expressionistic sound and visions).  So, when it comes to Othello, we see Tony John gradually start to seethe with jealousy – which is easy because he is still in love with his ex-wife Brita (Signe Hasso), playing Desdemona, and suspects she is falling for press agent Bill Friend (Edmond O’Brien).  Earlier in the film, when mulling over the part of the Moor from Venice, Tony stumbles into an Italian restaurant and he ends up going back to the cheap apartment of the waitress (Shelly Winters) for a one-night stand (she does not recognize him). Three hundred performances later, out of his mind with jealousy, he returns to her apartment, confused and tormented – and the film turns noir.  Although Colman’s take on Shakespeare is hammy, the use of the Bard’s scenes to subjugate his inner psychological conflicts, unconsciously, is pretty genius.  Although I never acted in Othello, I fondly recall my time doing Shakespeare during the Advanced Studies Program for NH kids at St Paul’s School (summer of 1984).   Tis truth, his lines have entered our culture, even if we’ve long forgotten their derivation: Othello (and Tony John by implication) “loved not wisely but too well.”

Sunday 8 October 2023

Broker (2022)


 ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆

Broker (2022) – H. Kore-eda

I’ve been a fan of Hirokazu Kore-eda’s work going back to After Life (1998) which I saw in London when I was in the UK for a job interview and Maborosi (1995) which I subsequently picked up on videocassette.  His films have always been unpredictable (in that they don’t follow a formula) and humanistic (in that they have empathy for the characters and show them warts and all). Broker was filmed in South Korea with a Korean cast, featuring Song Kang-ho (best known for his work with Bong Joon-ho in Parasite, 2019, or Memories of Murder, 2003; he won the best actor award at Cannes for this film), following a less successful (but still on point) venture in France (The Truth, 2019, with Deneuve and Binoche). Kore-eda has spent a lot of time focused on family relationships (and as such may be the natural heir of Yasujiro Ozu’s shomin-geki genre) and Broker continues the theme of his Cannes-winning Shoplifters (2018) that a “family” might be defined as any group of individuals that chooses to be one. Here, we find Sang-hyun (Song Kang-ho) and Dong-soo (Gang Dong-won) working as “brokers” who take abandoned babies from a local church group’s “baby box” and sell them on the black market to wannabe parents who cannot meet Korea’s strict adoption regulations.  Dong-soo was abandoned in a similar way as a child (left at an orphanage) and so these are not ordinary brokers but really care about who they are selling to.  So when the mother of their latest acquisition (a baby named Woo-sung) turns up, they are happy to work with her to find the right parents for her child. Apparently actress Lee Ji-eun is a pop star in Korea but her acting is strong and she fits into the ensemble who are, unbeknownst to them, being tracked by the police.  At the same time, Sang-hyun is being pursued by gangsters to whom he owes a gambling debt and Moon So-young (Lee Ji-eun) may also have a criminal past. So, Kore-eda builds suspense about where this is all going to end up. But it is true that the film does verge closer to sentimentality than some of the director’s other films, even if he doesn’t leave the characters where you might expect them to be, if this were a Hollywood film.