Sunday, 31 January 2016

Paths of Glory (1957)


☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ ½


Paths of Glory (1957) – S. Kubrick


The film somehow feels like a blend between a Kirk Douglas personal project (with its leftist anti-war sentiment and crusading role for Kirk) and a Kubrick film (with its intensely art-directed shots and set-ups). It also switches between grubby WWI trenches where soldiers get shell-shocked and the posh Versailles-like palace where the generals talk.  The plot takes the form of a classic morality play (and could have been scripted for the stage, except for the graphic realism on the battlefield) but, unlike in those works that feature heavy moral choices that create extreme tension, the right way to act is clear here.  The generals are wrong in their decisions to:  a) order the regiment to leave the trenches to try to take an impossible-to-take German position; b) hold a court-martial to try three “randomly selected” men for cowardice in the face of the enemy; c) offer no mercy when the pre-ordained verdict is death.  Kirk is both the commanding officer immediately beneath the most unfair general and the self-appointed defense attorney for the men.  He fights in vain against a wayward and biased system that shines a light on just how absurd and brutal warfare is (especially in that it allows some to pursue selfish aggrandizement at the expense of others).  One could argue that the absurdity has even been magnified and increased in these days of drone-attacks and high-tech combat.  Bottom line:  war is sickening. 

No comments:

Post a Comment