☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ ½
The
Shining (1980) -- S. Kubrick
Jack Nicholson and Shelley Duvall agree to
act as caretakers to the Overlook Hotel in Colorado during the winter. Their son Danny comes with them and his
psychic powers are immediately enflamed because of the Hotel’s scary past – a
previous caretaker had murdered his wife and two daughters with an axe. Stephen King, author of the source novel,
notoriously hated this film version because of the transgressions that Stanley
Kubrick made when transposing the book to the screen. There is no doubt either that this is a
Kubrick film, dominated by his obsessional production design and odd touches –
and endless tracking shots (in the hotel’s hallways and in the giant hedge maze
outside). I never noticed during
previous viewings just how slow and dream-like the acting can be. For example, when Jack sits with Danny on the
bed, telling him how he wishes they could stay in the hotel forever (and ever
and ever), the camera hangs expectantly and the scene takes a few beats longer
than it should. Moreover, when Jack
meets Delbert Grady in the red and white men’s room the pauses between each
line seem enormous and when they are shown in a two-shot, it feels like a
staged Jeff Wall photograph (as does the earlier shot in the bedroom and the
shot with the scary naked women in Room 237).
But truly it is the soundtrack, dominated by Penderecki, that makes even
mundane scenes feel creepy and even horrifying. But how mundane is the film,
really? On the simplest level, this is a
film about a breakdown in a family, with Nicholson perhaps feeling hemmed in
and restricted by his wife and son (this is less overt in the 113-minute
international cut of the film that I watched).
However, there may be deeper levels – and in fact that wormhole can be
very deep (try googling The Shining and conspiracy – or watch the outrageous
documentary Room 237) with a range of experts putting together the evidence
from Kubrick’s changes, ellipses, mistakes, and perhaps intended clues and
contradictions (particularly in “telling” continuity errors and the jumbled
physical geography of the hotel). Of
course, it seems believable that Kubrick wanted to comment on family and
relationship issues which can easily elicit anxiety and horror when trust slips,
but was he also encoding messages about the Holocaust or genocide of the Native
Americans? Has he left clues that he
faked the Apollo 11 moon landing footage?
On this pass through the film, I could find no real evidence of these “deeper”
things, even though I was looking. However,
I didn’t try to unpack the evidence closely.
I am willing to believe that Kubrick was deliberately trying to
disorient us and that things in the film are there for a reason. Yet, I just let the dream imagery wash over
me and I prayed for Scatman Crothers to come to my rescue.
No comments:
Post a Comment