☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆
Chimes
at Midnight (1965) – O. Welles
The culmination of Orson Welles’ re-visioning
of Shakespeare’s plays, after his filming of MacBeth (1948) and Othello (1951)
and his many staged versions, including Julius Caesar and something called “Five
Kings (Part One)” which was the forerunner for this production. Chimes at
Midnight extracts bits and pieces from several of the Bard’s history plays
(principally Henry IV, Parts One and Two) in order to focus on the relationship
between Sir John Falstaff (played merrily by Welles himself) and Prince Hal
(later to be crowned Henry V). And although he filmed in Europe on a low
budget, the result is never less than magnificent, with beautiful black and
white cinematography, perfect sets and costumes, and fine acting from Welles
himself, Sir John Gielgud (Henry IV) and Keith Baxter (Hal) with Margaret
Rutherford (Mistress Quickly), Jeanne Moreau (Doll Tearsheet), and Fernando Rey
(Worcester) in support, along with a large number of quirky character
actors. If Welles cut-and-paste from
footage shot in different times and places (and dubbed his own voice in for
others) you can’t really tell (his magic works). As with Othello, existing
locations were utilised (including for Henry IV’s stone castle) but a set was
built to represent the Inn where Falstaff resides, idling away his time on “sack”
(booze) and women and occasionally engaging in highway robbery. This is where Prince Hal also slums it, to
his father’s chagrin. The centrepiece to
the film is an astounding battle sequence, with men in suits of armour hacking
away at each other (and Falstaff hiding on the fringes or playing dead). This is the first glimpse we get of Hal
taking on his royal role, as he assists his father to stave off a rebellion by
Henry (Hotspur) Percy. Of course, later,
when Henry IV is dead and Hal ascends the throne, the relationship with
Falstaff is necessarily quashed, making for a melancholy (but not unexpected)
finale. Welles is perfect in the role,
perhaps his best; he hears the chimes indeed.
No comments:
Post a Comment