Sunday, 30 October 2022

Time Bandits (1981)


 ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆

Time Bandits (1981) – T. Gilliam

Early outing by director Terry Gilliam (fresh from Monty Python) that holds up surprisingly well.  Young Kevin’s life with his boorish consumerist parents is disrupted by six time-travelling dwarves who have stolen a map from the Supreme Being that shows all of the holes in space-time, allowing them to steal treasures from various epochs. Unfortunately, the Evil Genius, who has been imprisoned in the Fortress of Darkness by the Supreme Being also wants the map in order to escape and refigure the world. Kevin and the little people meet Napoleon (Ian Holm), Robin Hood (John Cleese), and King Agamemnon (Sean Connery) before entering the Land of Legends where things get weirder. The special effects are pretty cool (for the time period) and although things get dark, it seems appropriate for kids.  At least until the end, when Kevin’s parents are turned into lumps of coal – Amon (aged 10) did not appreciate this and thought it spoiled the film.  So much for black comedy.


Saturday, 29 October 2022

The Wicker Man (1973)


 ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ ½

The Wicker Man (1973) – R. Hardy

Classic folk-horror with Christopher Lee as the Lord of Summerisle, off the coast of Scotland, where the old Pagan traditions are valued. So, there’s a culture clash when Edward Woodward (as Sargeant Howie), a devout Catholic, shows up to investigate a missing girl about whom his department has been tipped off. But no one seems to recollect the missing girl (Rowan) or else they are hiding something! Howie struggles to understand the locals who have a very free approach to sexuality that upsets his prudish nature. Moreover, the May-Day festival is soon approaching and the island is preparing for a big celebration that will include animal costumes and a parade – plus, as Howie discovers at the library, the possibility of a virgin (Rowan?) being sacrificed!  He is determined to thwart anything horrible that might occur -- but he is entangled in a mystery that he can’t quite solve. Director Robin Hardy apparently released a director’s cut that is a bit longer (and with some scenes in a different order) than the 88 min theatrical cut I watched. Probably best not to forget that this is a horror film (and the end is certainly shocking) but the film certainly pushes you to appreciate the old ways, don’t you think?

 

Sunday, 23 October 2022

Dead of Night (1945)


 ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆

Dead of Night (1945) – A. Cavalcanti, C. Crichton, B. Dearden, & R. Hamer

Classic spooky horror omnibus film from Ealing Studios with contributions from four notable directors from their famed team. Basil Dearden handles the framing story, which is remarkable in its own right, with architect Walter Craig (Mervyn Johns) arriving at Pilgrim’s Farm but feeling a pronounced sense of dejá vu which only increases when he goes inside and sees a small group gathered. Soon, he realises that he is remembering a dream and goes on to prognosticate about events that will soon happen (and, of course, they do). One of the group is a psychiatrist who plays the role of Doubting Thomas throwing cold water on the idea of premonitions. But each of the characters then proceeds to tell a story about their own brush with the supernatural (each story showcased by a different director).  Dearden begins with a short story about a race car driver who receives a warning about his own death (“room for one more inside, sir!”) which allows him to avoid it. Then, with Calvacanti in the director’s chair, young Sally tells of her encounter with a young boy (while playing hide-and-seek) who turns out to be a murdered ghost. Next, Googie Withers stars in Robert Hamer’s tale of a haunted mirror that curses her husband. After this rather harrowing tale, a bit of light relief: Charles Crichton directs Naughton & Wayne (famous for their roles in Hitchcock’s The Lady Vanishes, 1938) as a pair of golfers who use 18-holes match-play do decide who will win the lady they both adore. The loser commits suicide and becomes a ghost who ineptly haunts his former friend. And then the most famous of tales (by Calvacanti again) features Michael Redgrave as a ventriloquist at odds with his dummy.  This might be the one to give you nightmares, if you are small.  Finally, we return again to the framing story and its haunting conclusion. If you love the sort of uncanny horror that leaves you with a weird suspicion that the world is far stranger than we think, then I highly recommend this masterpiece.   

 

Saturday, 22 October 2022

The Birds (1963)


 ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆

The Birds (1963) – A. Hitchcock

Whenever I revisit The Birds, I find myself somewhat genuinely surprised again that it is much weirder and slower than I remembered. This isn’t a movie where the heroes successfully battle a creature that may attack at any time but instead it features an ominous change in the world where nature has turned against humans.  But why? Seemingly the birds have turned against us at random, although many writers point at Melanie Daniels (Tippi Hedren) as potentially responsible. After all, her wayward prank – lying to Mitch Brenner (Rod Taylor) and then bringing him lovebirds (in a cage, of course) – seems to have set something off (although gulls were amassing in the San Francisco skies even before this incident).  She is also wounded somehow, abandoned by her mother and in need of love – from Mitch or from _his_ mother Lydia (Jessica Tandy) who is distant and suspicious. Poor Annie Hayworth (Suzanne Pleshette), Mitch’s former flame, is sidelined but doesn’t seem to hold any animosity toward the others (that might be the source of any negative energy riling up the birds). Hitch himself provided a hint when he suggested the film was about “complacency” (according to Robin Wood). Have humans cordoned themselves off from nature, creating comfortable safe routines and habitats for ourselves? Or worse, have our practices compromised nature itself, such that it needs to fight back? I’m not suggesting Hitch was an environmentalist but, seen today, the selfish preoccupations of Melanie, Mitch, Lydia, and Annie clearly pale in comparison to the wider problems the world faces.  It’s no wonder the birds are pissed off.  And, yes, if you are looking to see birds swoop down on children, tear at people’s flesh with their beaks, and gouge out their eyes, you’ll find it here too.

 

Tuesday, 18 October 2022

Eyes Without a Face (1960)


 ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ ½

Eyes Without a Face (1960) – G. Franju

Exceedingly creepy, even gruesome, film (although with really very little blood and gore) that explores the complicated emotions of a (clearly immoral and possibly mad) doctor (Pierre Brasseur) who is desperately seeking a breakthrough in skin-grafting technology to assist him in a face-transplant for his terribly disfigured twenty-something daughter, Christiane (Edith Scob), whose emotions are also explored. With the help of his nurse-assistant (Alida Valli), herself a recipient of a prior skin-graft (and therefore indebted to him), the doctor kidnaps young women and surgically removes their faces for transplanting to his daughter (a procedure that the donor does not always survive). Between surgeries (which often fail), Christiane wanders the doctor’s mansion in an expressionless white mask, adding a surreal and dreamlike quality to the proceedings. Increasing the anxiety level of viewers (and characters in the film), the doctor keeps a kennel full of dogs for his experiments in the basement whose constant barking provides a soundtrack (when Maurice Jarre’s weird circus-like music isn’t playing).  But soon, the police are closing in and the gig is up … or is it?  With beautiful and stark black and white cinematography by Eugen Schüfftan (who won the Oscar for The Hustler, 1961, the next year), this was the high-water mark for director Georges Franju (although I also recommend his remake of the silent serial Judex, 1963). Guaranteed to unsettle.


Monday, 17 October 2022

The Northman (2022)


 ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆

The Northman (2022) – R. Eggers

Exceptionally mythic (or legendary) and drawn from the same texts that inspired Shakespeare’s Hamlet, Robert Eggers’ film takes place in the late 9th century somewhere in present day Scandinavia (“Raven Island” and later Iceland). Academic historians contributed some insights to the production. As the story opens, we see King Aurvandil War-Raven (Ethan Hawke) returning from battle to his family, Queen Gudrún (Nicole Kidman) and son Amleth (Oscar Novak). Amleth is now to be initiated into the rites of manhood as heir apparent. However, only a short while after the mystic and private ceremony, Auvandil is killed by his own brother Fjölnir (Claes Bang) while Amleth escapes alone in a rowboat. Fast forward a couple of decades and Amleth (now Alexander Skarsgård) has joined the bear-wolf tribe as a rampaging berserker. After assailing a Slav village, he hears that Fjölnir has lost his kingdom and fled to Iceland – he stows away, pretending to be a slave (along with actual slave and later love interest Olga, played by Anya Taylor-Joy) on a ship bound for Fjölnir’s lands.  Upon arrival, he stays undercover, assessing the situation (including his mother’s cozy set-up with Fjölnir) before deciding how to act out his revenge. Undoubtedly an Eggers film (he also made The Witch, 2015, and The Lighthouse, 2019), this would have looked amazing on the big screen with its epic landscapes, period settings, fire and fury. But it is the mystic feel that really elevates the picture into something special, beyond your typical Hollywood blockbuster. The camera glides into some weird spaces, acknowledges Björk to be a Seeress (and Willem Dafoe to be a Fool), and makes you feel as though you are there, really in the Viking Age, dirty, obligated to Norse gods, and facing a nasty, brutish, and short life. The only real demerit that this film earns is its rather single-minded (and occasionally glacial) procession from revenge desired to revenge completed – it’s awesome to witness but, somehow, I expected things to be less on the nose. However, that may grant it that legendary quality and I guess fate is inexorable after all.

 

Saturday, 15 October 2022

Pulse (Kairo) (2001)


 ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆

Pulse (Kairo) (2001) – K. Kurosawa

I return to Kiyoshi Kurosawa’s tale of dread more often than many other J-Horror films from two decades ago. Sure, it is dated – just one look at the Windows operating system or mobile phones tells you that – but its themes are still universal (if running particularly deep in Japan). After a brief opening on the open sea with Captain Kôji Yakusho (a foreshadow of the film’s end), we meet Michi (Kumiko Asô) and Junko (Kurume Arisaka) who work in a garden store and are concerned about one of their co-workers who hasn’t shown up to work for a while. When Michi visits him, he abruptly commits suicide – and then disappears, leaving only a black mark on the wall and some weird images on his computer. Next, we meet Kawashima (Haruhiko Katô) who is interested in learning about the internet – and lands on a website that asks, “Would you like to meet a ghost?” (the film’s tagline); he quickly shuts down the computer and seeks help from the university’s computer lab, staffed by Harue (Koyuki). Eventually, these two pairs of young people discover “the forbidden room” – entered by a doorway edged by red tape and possessed of some creepy dead souls. In fact, there may be more than one forbidden room; a grad student argues that too many people have died since the start of time and now the souls are seeping back into our world, particularly in these isolated places. But it is the living who seem to be suffering from loneliness and isolation just as much as these lonely dead and that is Kurosawa’s key theme; perhaps he was prescient in pointing to the (then incipient) internet as a wellspring of alienation rather than connection. Yet, as the world falls apart – and the apocalypse is not far off here – the survivors are those who manage to overcome their insecurities and team up.  But getting to this conclusion requires viewers to endure some really creepy scenes.   

 

Sunday, 9 October 2022

K(w)aidan (1964)


 ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆

K(w)aidan (1964) – M. Kobayashi

Director Masaki Kobayashi followed up his triumph Hara-Kiri (1962) with this film drawn from Lafcadio Hearn’s book of Japanese folktales, Kwaidan (1904), which included many tales of yokai and ghosts. The most famous are probably “Yuki Onna” (Woman of the Snow) and “Mimi-nashi Hōichi” (Hoichi the Earless), both included here along with two other tales “Black Hair” and “In a Cup of Tea”. The film is notable for its astounding art direction – entirely artificial and studio-bound – but it is admittedly slow (too slow for kids). As Ayako pointed out, it isn’t exactly horror either but rather sad stories with spooky elements. The first three tales take place in the samurai era.  “Black Hair” finds an ambitious young man leave his wife (who works as a weaver) to take up a position working for the local lord – he remarries to afford himself a better social position. But he is unhappy and years later returns to his first wife who lives in the same house and seemingly hasn’t aged (a warning sign!). “Yuki Onna” stars Tatsuya Nakadai as a woodcutter who gets lost in a snowstorm with his elderly partner; they take refuge in an old hut whereupon a mysterious woman/demon descends upon them, stealing the old man’s breath and forcing the younger one (Nakadai) to swear never to tell another soul or suffer the same consequences. “Hoichi the Earless” recounts the story of a blind cleric who is bewitched by a clan of ghosts to sing the epic tale of their last sea battle night after night; when the head priest discovers this, they cover Hoichi from head to toe with protective spells -- but they miss two spots. Finally, “In a Cup of Tea”, takes place later in 1904, showing a writer who sees the image of another man in his tea, eventually drinking it anyway, whereupon the ghostly man’s retainers show up to fight him. We have the original Criterion DVD which is apparently a 161-minute cut but newer releases run an even longer 183 minutes.  

 

Saturday, 8 October 2022

I Walked with a Zombie (1943)


 ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆

I Walked with a Zombie (1943) – J. Tourneur

From the famed production stable of Val Lewton and directed by Jacques Tourneur comes this haunting tale of voodoo in the Caribbean. Although apparently drawn from a non-fiction report, screenwriters Curt Siodmak and Ardel Wray tack on elements of Jane Eyre to give the film more dramatic tension and mystery. Frances Dee stars as a Betsy Connell, a Canadian nurse hired to look after a mentally ill patient on the island of San Sebastian (probably Haiti) by her husband Paul Holland (Tom Conway). Mrs Holland is completely zombified but can walk around in a trance.  Upon arrival, Betsy meets Paul’s younger half-brother Wes Rand (James Ellison) and soon learns that he was having an affair with Mrs Holland which was discovered by Paul. The shock apparently led to Jessica Holland’s illness and Wes’s subsequent alcoholism.  After Betsy’s attempts to revive Jessica with an insulin shock fail, she is convinced by her maid (Theresa Harris) to try voodoo.  This leads to the most spooky scenes in the picture, as Betsy walks with zombie Jessica to the crossroads and beyond to voodoo headquarters (the houmfort) – along the way they see creepy Darby Jones, the zombie who guards the crossroads. Little does she know that Paul and Wes’s mother, Mrs. Rand (Edith Barrett), has been masquerading as the voice of the voodoo spirits at the Houmfort (in order to convince the locals to adopt modern medicine). Yet what seems to throw cold water on the possibility that voodoo is real is quickly undone by the script, which proceeds to a tragic ending in which characters act by ambiguous compulsions. Mysterious and beautiful.

Friday, 7 October 2022

Suspiria (1977)


 ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ ½

Suspiria (1977) – D. Argento

 I don’t usually go for movies with gore or slasher-type killers but writer-director Dario Argento brought something different to horror in the 1970s. Influenced by Mario Bava, Argento uses garishly coloured sets and lighting and takes the giallo (Italian pulp mystery fiction) as his genre of choice. But with Suspiria, Argento moved more clearly into supernatural territory. Suzy Bannion (Jessica Harper) is the American ballet student who arrives in Germany to study at the Tanz Academy led by headmistress Madame Blanc (Joan Bennett, star of many Fritz Lang films of the ‘40s) and strict teacher Miss Tanner (Alida Valli, star of The Third Man and Hitchcock’s Paradine Case in the ‘40s). She arrives on a rainy night and sees another student fleeing the school (subsequently murdered).  Although she originally wishes to stay off-campus, after a strange hallway encounter that leaves her woozy, she is moved to a room in the main building with the other students, including Sara (Stefania Casini), who becomes an ally.  Argento uses weird camera angles and tracking shots to add to the ominous feel of the place (and a maggot infestation makes it worse). Rumours swirl and eventually Suzy heads to the local psychiatric hospital/university to ask about witchcraft (to a sadly dubbed Udo Kier). What she learns makes her even more suspicious about the leaders of the dance academy, particularly when Sara disappears. Of course, we soon discover that witchcraft is real but Argento manages the mystery elements of the plot expertly (a talent he was later to lose), even as the whole thing resembles a dream… or nightmare.  A spooky masterpiece elevated by an amazing score by the rock band Goblin but punctuated with some bloody violent set-pieces (enter at your own risk!). The 2018 remake with Tilda Swinton pales in comparison but is altogether a different beast.


Tuesday, 4 October 2022

Island of Lost Souls (1932)


 ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆

Island of Lost Souls (1932) – E. C. Kenton

I read H. G. Wells’ The Island of Doctor Moreau (1896) in my teens, although I barely remember it now. The film hones in on the horror in the story rather than on the more philosophical inclinations of the author (dealing with the theory of evolution, animal ethics, etc.) and, for this reason, Wells apparently was not a fan of the adaptation by screenwriters Waldemar Young and Philip Wylie.  Yet the film, as directed by Erle C. Kenton, is truly horrific – with no constraints placed by censors (the film is “pre-code”), a palpably decadent weirdness pervades the proceedings. Of course, there is an assortment of half-beast/half-human oddities (with excellent make-up) on the Island, created via sadistic experimentation by Doctor Moreau (played by Charles Laughton in a gleefully leering and cruel performance), that evokes not only dread and disgust but sympathy for their horrible plight. Shipwrecked Edward Parker (Richard Arlen) gradually discovers the evil goings-on and is shocked when he realises that Moreau has attempted to manipulate him into providing evidence for whether the half-beasts can procreate with humans (as well as speak/learn/and follow the Law). Lota, the Panther Woman (played by Kathleen Burke, who won a contest by Paramount to star in the film), is the target (and in true pre-code fashion, she is scantily clad and the target of the camera’s male gaze) and, despite his fiancée, Parker almost seems to give in. But when said fiancée actually arrives on the island to rescue him, with a sea captain in tow, Moreau tries to turn his beasts against them, causing them to violate his Law (no killing, no walking on all fours, etc.), and therefore also to realise that there is nothing stopping them from killing Moreau himself, which they do. (Spoiler). The film is all humid tropical jungle, shrouded in fog and silence (no musical soundtrack) save for the cry of the beasts in the House of Pain.  A strange artefact from another time and place.